RB2011iL-IN

The RB2011 is a low cost multi port device series. Designed for indoor use, and available in many different cases, with a multitude of options.

The RB2011iL-IN is the most basic model, with five Gigabit ethernet ports, five Fast ethernet ports, power jack and PoE support.

It’s powered by the new Atheros next generation 600MHz 74K MIPS network processor and has 64MB of RAM and a Level4 RouterOS license.

There is PoE output function for port #10 - it can power other PoE capable devices with the same voltage as applied to the unit. Maximum load on the port is 500mA.

RouterBOARD 2011iL-IN comes with desktop enclosure and power supply.

Wall mount kit for network closet is available for purchase as an optional accessory.

Product specifications

Details
Product codeRB2011iL-IN
CPU nominal frequency600 MHz
CPU core count1
Size of RAM64 MB
ArchitectureMIPS-BE
10/100 Ethernet ports5
10/100/1000 Ethernet ports5
Power Jack1
PoE outYes
Supported input voltage8 V - 30 V
PoE inYes
Dimensions214x86mm
Tested ambient temperature-35C to +65C
License level4
CPUAR9344
Max Power consumption6W
Storage typeNAND
Storage size128 MB
Suggested price$99.00

Included parts

Performance test results

RB2011iL-INAR9344 1G&100M all port test
ModeConfiguration1518 byte512 byte64 byte
kppsMbpskppsMbpskppsMbps
Bridgingnone (fast path)122.01,481.6232.0950.3269.6138.0
Bridging25 bridge filter rules83.61,015.286.0352.387.644.9
Routingnone (fast path)122.01,481.6210.0860.2226.9116.2
Routing25 simple queues100.51,220.5103.9425.6106.654.6
Routing25 ip filter rules56.8689.859.6244.160.531.0
  1. All tests are done with Xena Networks specialized test equipment (XenaBay),and done according to RFC2544 (Xena2544)
  2. Max throughput is determined with 30+ second attempts with 0,1% packet loss tolerance in 64, 512, 1518 byte packet sizes
  3. Values in Italic indicate that max throughput was reached without maxing out CPU, but because board interface configuration was maxed out
  4. Test results show device maximum performance, and are reached using mentioned hardware and software configuration, different configurations most likely will result in lower results