RB750

The RB750 is a small five port ethernet router in a nice plastic case.

Not only this is an attractive looking tiny SOHO unit, its price is lower than the RouterOS license alone - there simply is no choice when it comes to managing your wired home network, the RB750 has it all.

Not only it’s affordable, small, good looking and easy to use - It’s probably the most affordable MPLS capable router on the market! No more compromise between price and features - RB750 has both. With its compact design and clean looks, it will fit perfectly into any SOHO environment.

Box contains: RB750, plastic case, power supply

Product specifications

Details
Product codeRB750
CPU nominal frequency400 MHz
CPU core count1
Size of RAM32 MB
ArchitectureMIPS-BE
10/100 Ethernet ports5
10/100/1000 Ethernet ports0
MiniPCI slots0
MiniPCI-e slots0
Number of USB ports0
Memory Cards0
Power Jack1
802.3af supportNo
Supported input voltage10 V - 28 V
PoE inYes
PoE outNo
Voltage MonitorNo
CPU temperature monitorNo
PCB temperature monitorNo
Dimensions113x89x28mm. Weight without packaging and cables: 129g
Operating SystemRouterOS
Operating temperature range-40℃ to +55℃
License level4
Antenna gain DBINo
Current MonitorNo
CPUAR7241-AH1A
Max Power consumption2.5W
SFP ports0
SFP+ ports0
Number of chains0
Serial portNone
Suggested price$39.95

Performance test results

RB750 (400Mhz) 100M port test RouterOS
Mode Configuration 64 byte 512 byte 1518 byte
kpps Mbps kpps Mbps kpps Mbps
Bridging none (fast path) 194.0 127.3 117.0 496.1 40.3 495.2
Bridging 25 bridge filter rules 53.7 35.2 52.3 221.9 40.3 495.2
Routing none (fast path) 183.7 120.5 117.0 496.1 40.3 495.2
Routing 25 simple queues 92.8 60.8 88.5 375.1 40.3 495.2
Routing 25 ip filter rules 37.5 24.6 38.4 162.6 37.6 462.4
  1. All tests are done with Xena Networks specialized test equipment (XenaBay),and done according to RFC2544 (Xena2544)
  2. Max throughput is determined with 30+ second attempts with 0,1% packet loss tolerance in 64, 512, 1518 byte packet sizes
  3. Values in Italic indicate that max throughput was reached without maxing out CPU, but because board interface configuration was maxed out
  4. Test results show device maximum performance, and are reached using mentioned hardware and software configuration, different configurations most likely will result in lower results