The RB951-2n is the home wireless AP you have been waiting for! It is small and compact, has five Ethernet ports and a 802.11b/g/n wireless AP with an antenna built in.
This model is much smaller than the more powerful RB751U-2HnD model, the RB951-2n looks exactly like our popular RB750 series. The device is very small and will look good in any home or office, wall mounting anchor holes are provided.
Box contains: RB951-2n, plastic case, power supply
VIDEO Product specifications
Details Product code RB951-2n CPU nominal frequency 400 MHz CPU core count 1 Architecture MIPS-BE Size of RAM 32 MB 10/100 Ethernet ports 5 10/100/1000 Ethernet ports 0 MiniPCI slots 0 MiniPCI-e slots 0 Wireless chip model AR9331-AL1A Wireless standards 802.11b/g/n Number of USB ports 0 Power Jack 1 802.3af support No Supported input voltage 6 V - 31 V PoE in Yes PoE out No Voltage Monitor No PCB temperature monitor No CPU temperature monitor No Dimensions 113x89x28mm Operating temperature range -20C .. +50C License level 4 Antenna gain DBI 1.5 Current Monitor No CPU AR9331-AL1A Max Power consumption 3W SFP ports 0 SFP+ ports 0 Number of chains 1 Serial port None Suggested price $45.00 Wireless specifications
2.4 GHz TX RX 1MBit/s 11MBit/s 17 6MBit/s 15 -92 54MBit/s 11 -73 MCS0 15 -92 MCS7 9 -67 Included parts Performance test results
RB951-2n AR9331 100M all port test Mode Configuration 64 byte 512 byte 1518 byte kpps Mbps kpps Mbps kpps Mbps Bridging none (fast path) 146.7 75.1 112.4 460.4 40.0 485.8 Bridging 25 bridge filter rules 49.6 25.4 49.1 201.1 40.0 485.8 Routing none (fast path) 142.4 72.9 106.6 436.6 40.0 485.8 Routing 25 simple queues 80.3 41.1 76.9 315.0 40.0 485.8 Routing 25 ip filter rules 35.8 18.3 35.7 146.2 33.2 403.2 All tests are done with Xena Networks specialized test equipment (XenaBay),and done according to RFC2544 (Xena2544) Max throughput is determined with 30+ second attempts with 0,1% packet loss tolerance in 64, 512, 1518 byte packet sizes Values in Italic indicate that max throughput was reached without maxing out CPU, but because board interface configuration was maxed out Test results show device maximum performance, and are reached using mentioned hardware and software configuration, different configurations most likely will result in lower results