SXT SA5

SXTG-5HPnD-SAr2 is a low cost, high speed 5GHz outdoor wireless sector access point. It has a 90 degree antenna to provide a wider coverage than our previous SXT units.

Complete with a ready to mount enclosure and built-in 14dBi antenna, the package contains everything you need to set it up in a matter of minutes. The inside of the case is covered in special shielding to improve operation in high interference areas and antenna front to back ratio.

Box contains: SXT wireless device with integrated antenna, pole mounting bracket, mounting ring, PoE injector, power adapter, quick setup guide

Product specifications

Details
Product codeRBSXTG-5HPnD-SAr2
CPU nominal frequency600 MHz
CPU core count1
Size of RAM64 MB
10/100 Ethernet ports0
10/100/1000 Ethernet ports1
MiniPCI slots0
MiniPCI-e slots0
Wireless chip modelAR9344-BC2A
Wireless standards802.11a/n
Number of USB ports1
Power Jack0
802.3af supportNo
PoE inYes
Voltage MonitorYes
PCB temperature monitorYes
CPU temperature monitorNo
Dimensions140x140x56mm
Operating SystemRouterOS
Operating temperature range-30C .. +80C
License level4
Antenna gain DBI13
Current MonitorNo
CPUAR9344-BC2A
Max Power consumptionUp to 7W
SFP ports0
SFP+ ports0
USB slot typeUSB type A
Number of chains2
Serial portNone
Suggested price$99.00

Included parts

Performance test results

RBSXTG-5HPnD-SAr2 (600Mhz) Gigabit port test RouterOS
Mode Configuration 64 byte 512 byte 1518 byte
kpps Mbps kpps Mbps kpps Mbps
Bridging none (fast path) 269.6 176.9 232.0 983.7 81.0 995.3
Bridging 25 bridge filter rules 87.6 57.5 86.0 364.6 81.0 995.3
Routing none (fast path) 226.9 148.8 210.0 890.4 81.0 995.3
Routing 25 simple queues 106.6 69.9 103.9 440.5 81.0 995.3
Routing 25 ip filter rules 60.5 39.7 59.6 252.7 56.8 698.0
  1. All tests are done with Xena Networks specialized test equipment (XenaBay),and done according to RFC2544 (Xena2544)
  2. Max throughput is determined with 30+ second attempts with 0,1% packet loss tolerance in 64, 512, 1518 byte packet sizes
  3. Values in Italic indicate that max throughput was reached without maxing out CPU, but because board interface configuration was maxed out
  4. Test results show device maximum performance, and are reached using mentioned hardware and software configuration, different configurations most likely will result in lower results