RB951Ui-2HnD

The RB951Ui-2HnD is a wireless SOHO AP with a new generation Atheros CPU and more processing power. It has five Ethernet ports, one USB 2.0 port and a high power 2.4GHz 1000mW 802.11b/g/n wireless AP with antennas built in.

It has a 600MHz CPU,128MB of RAM and PoE output function for port #5 - it can power other PoE capable devices with the same voltage as applied
to the unit. Maximum load on the port is 500mA.

Package contains RouterBOARD 951Ui-2HnD in a plastic case and power adapter.

Product specifications

Details
Product codeRB951Ui-2HnD
10/100 Ethernet ports5
Antenna gain2.5
CPUAR9344
CPU core count1
CPU nominal frequency600 MHz
Dimensions113x138x29mm
License level4
Max Power consumptionUp to 7W
Number of USB ports1
Number of chains2
Operating SystemRouterOS
PoE inYes
PoE outYes
Power Jack1
Size of RAM128 MB
Storage size128 MB
Storage typeNAND
Supported input voltage7 V - 31 V
Tested ambient temperature-20C +50C
USB slot typeUSB type A
Wireless chip modelAR9344
Wireless standards802.11b/g/n
Suggested price$59.95

Wireless specifications

2.4 GHz
Transmit power (dBm)Receive SensitivityTransmit power (mW)
6MBit/s30-961000
54MBit/s25-80316
MCS030-961000
MCS723-78200

wireless parameters may be limited in software, depending on your local regulatory limitations

Included parts

Ethernet test results

RB951Ui-2HnDAR9344 100M all port test
ModeConfiguration1518 byte512 byte64 byte
kppsMbpskppsMbpskppsMbps
Bridgingnone (fast path)40.0485.8116.5477.2269.6138.0
Bridging25 bridge filter rules40.0485.886.0352.387.644.9
Routingnone (fast path)40.0485.8116.5477.2226.9116.2
Routing25 simple queues40.0485.8103.9425.6106.654.6
Routing25 ip filter rules40.0485.859.6244.160.531.0
  1. All tests are done with Xena Networks specialized test equipment (XenaBay),and done according to RFC2544 (Xena2544)
  2. Max throughput is determined with 30+ second attempts with 0,1% packet loss tolerance in 64, 512, 1518 byte packet sizes
  3. Values in Italic indicate that max throughput was reached without maxing out CPU, but because board interface configuration was maxed out
  4. Test results show device maximum performance, and are reached using mentioned hardware and software configuration, different configurations most likely will result in lower results