mAP lite

The mAP lite is our smallest wireless access point. It is barely larger than a matchbox, we even had to use a special Ethernet port to match it’s slim profile.

You can carry it anywhere: use as a travel router to extend that hotel internet to all your devices, or as a client device to improve your laptop signal range, the tiny mAP lite will be always with you.

It can also serve as a simple configuration tool for your servers, if there is no ethernet on your mobile device.

The mAP lite is a dual chain 802.11 b/g/n device and operates in 2GHz.

Product specifications

Details
Product codeRBmAPL-2nD
10/100 Ethernet ports1
Antenna gain1.5
CPUQCA9533
CPU core count1
CPU nominal frequency650 MHz
Dimensions48x49x11mm
License level4
Max Power consumption3.5W
Number of chains2
Operating SystemRouterOS
PoE in802.3at
Power Jack1
Size of RAM64 MB
Storage size16 MB
Storage typeFLASH
Supported input voltage5 V - 60 V
Tested ambient temperature-30 + 70 C
Wireless chip modelQCA9533
Wireless standards802.11b/g/n
Suggested price$25

Wireless specifications

2.4 GHz
Transmit power (dBm)Receive SensitivityTransmit power (mW)
1MBit/s22-96158
11MBit/s22-89158
6MBit/s20-93100
54MBit/s18-7463
MCS020-93100
MCS716-7140

wireless parameters may be limited in software, depending on your local regulatory limitations

Included parts

Ethernet test results

RBmAPL-2nDQCA9533 100M one port test
ModeConfiguration1518 byte512 byte64 byte
kppsMbpskppsMbpskppsMbps
Bridgingnone (fast path)8.198.423.596.3173.688.9
Bridging25 bridge filter rules8.198.423.596.370.936.3
Routingnone (fast path)8.198.423.596.3160.882.3
Routing25 simple queues8.198.423.596.390.846.5
Routing25 ip filter rules8.198.423.596.343.222.1
  1. All tests are done with Xena Networks specialized test equipment (XenaBay),and done according to RFC2544 (Xena2544)
  2. Max throughput is determined with 30+ second attempts with 0,1% packet loss tolerance in 64, 512, 1518 byte packet sizes
  3. Values in Italic indicate that max throughput was reached without maxing out CPU, but because board interface configuration was maxed out
  4. Test results show device maximum performance, and are reached using mentioned hardware and software configuration, different configurations most likely will result in lower results